What Color Nail Polish White Dress

Counterparties must be aware of the request for damages

Counterparties must be aware of the request for damages

Where an action for damages is impermissible, because it does not duly notified to the counterpart, the new code of the administrative process allows still require the opinion of the court on the merits of the dispute

Then, the applicant may propose, again, independent claim in the case of unlawful

In memory concluding the applicant main (which on appeal was "confidential" di chiedere il risarcimento dei danni), ha formalmente chiesto la condanna del Comune al “risarcimento del danno ingiusto, da liquidarsi anche in via equitativa”.

A tal riguardo, va osservato che, in base all’art. 30, comma 5, cod. proc. amm, nel caso in cui sia stata proposta azione di annullamento, “la domanda risarcitoria può essere formulata nel corso del giudizio o, comunque, sino a centoventi giorni dal passaggio in giudicato della relativa sentenza” (cfr. art. 30, comma 5, cod. proc. amm).

Tuttavia, se formulata nel corso del giudizio, la domanda risarcitoria, secondo il costante e condiviso orientamento della giurisprudenza, deve essere notificata alle controparti: “E’ammissibile una domanda di risarcimento dei danni formulata nel corso del processo avanti al TAR e con semplice memoria, purché detta memoria sia notificata alle controparti” (cfr. Consiglio di Stato, Sez. IV, 7 settembre 2010, n. 6485; nello stesso senso, TAR Lazio, Roma, Sez. III, 15 gennaio 2010, n. 279).

Nel caso di specie, la domanda di risarcimento dei danni, formalmente presentata dalla ricorrente principale nella memoria depositata il 24 gennaio 2011, non è stata notificata alle controparti.

Né può, in this case, forward the notification of the application, since the mere "reserve" to bring the claim for compensation (maybe in another separate opinion), does not amount to a formal proposition of the same.

Therefore, the demand for compensation made by the principal applicant in these proceedings must be regarded as unacceptable because it does not duly notified to the counterparties.

remains, however, affect the right of the applicant to assert again that request by separate action (see TRGA Bolzano, July 7, 2001, n. 171).

The Board believes that it can apply to the case in art. 34, paragraph 3, of the new code of administrative process (immediately applicable, as a procedural rule), under which, "when, during the proceedings, the annulment of the contested measure is no longer useful for the plaintiff, the court establishes the illegality of the act if there is an interest for compensatory damages. "

The principal applicant has not in fact the annulment of the award plus interest, which can not influence the effect of the contract and, consequently, the regeneration of the race, but interest in having the illegality of the acts, for compensation.

Conclusively, is determined the illegality of the contested measures with the main action under paragraph 2, 3 and 4, for compensation purposes.

The Board noted, finally, is there any ground for declaring the ineffectiveness of the contract (pursuant to Art. 122 cod. Proc. Admin.) Considered that the works have been fully executed by the company awarded .

number of law in 98 of 10 March 2011 ruled Tar from the Trentino Alto Adige, the Autonomous Province of Bolzano