Brunetta economy not understand anything.
front of his battle over 'big babies' I can only draw this conclusion. Brunetta wants the support of young the dismantling of the safety unions that their parents have. In other words, he wants that new workers are precarious and flexible schierino for a partial reduction of the Welfare previous state (which does not concern them) in exchange for an improvement in their precarious situation and flexible.
In other words, Brunetta's economy does not understand anything there.
Let me explain. Economics is a social science. It is not physics: if you say to a rock fall at a certain rate from a certain height and then drop it, the stone will continue to fall as usual. Instead, people react to economic models.
For example, in Italy many students are away from home. When you move to another city in another apartment, you usually have to sign a new internet connection. No problem, it takes? Yes, but in Italy the leading Internet provider did sign (you have agreed under the table), and the quality of the service leaves much to be desired. In other words: if you subscribe today Alice ADSL connection, clasp hands and pray that you come first two months.
But the mothers of the students are Italian mothers: they are anxious. They call, they want to speak with his son on the day of his arrival. But the fixed telephone calls for another contract, more money, and usually students do not even think. Internet calling, Skype, which is free. All you need is an internet connection, but how? Idea. Let's go ahead and catch the right to access the university.
So if you go to Padua, Bologna, and Urbino (to name only three major cities of our country, university), the evening, there are squads of guys in front of the university, laptop on knees, chatting. And as many have just moved and need know someone, it happens that the groups will widen to wildfire. I know people who, despite their connection works fine, keep going right in front of the laptop to "check facebook and see who's there. I suspect that if a few years the Italian service providers will improve, students may still use as a meeting place for the small pool of wireless leaking around the clock by the door of the university. Why do people react to the economic model that is imposed.
Brunetta is still rather old-school economic . I do not question that kind of economy does not have secrets for him. But simply è vecchia . Il modello che ha in mente Brunetta è quello riassumibile in: "La gente fa quello che le conviene fare, razionalmente, senza prendere in minima considerazione il vantaggio altrui o i vantaggi non monetari (cioè o si fa per soldi o non si fa)". Un modello talmente raffinato che stenta a spiegare l'esistenza di intere industrie, come quella del Lotto ("Perchè la gente dovrebbe giocare se la possibilità di vincere è infima rispetto al premio?"), o quella del tabacco. Un modello così elaborato che funziona bene solo con gli avvocati aziendali. Un impianto di pensiero che non riesce a spiegare perchè la gente faccia i regali i Natale.
Capite che come scienza è un po' sorpassata.
Nel frattempo abbiamo avuto teorie molto più complesse con strumenti matematici molto più raffinati (teoria dei giochi in primis). Ora siamo capaci di creare un modello che stimi la quantità necessaria di persone bianche in un ghetto nero (o viceversa) che sia ritenuta sufficientemente accettabile da indurre un bianco a trasferirvici. Bisogna prendere in considerazione cinque o sei variabili di interazione tra il gruppo di riferimento, il gruppo locale, la sua tolleranza, la tolleranza media dell'acquirente, etc.
Nel modello che Brunetta applica funziona così: se il prezzo è inferiore, ci si trasferisce là. Non importa se sei un giovane colletto bianco in mezzo alla favelas di Rio.
Ma dicevamo, i bamboccioni.
I bamboccioni do not exist as an entity unto itself, as a phenomenon rained from heaven upon this generation as a divine curse. As the boys out of the university, the current graduates have met a particular economic system. In particular, enormous barriers of entry into the working world, a world that has squeezed them with contracts, impossible hours, virtually no union strong enough to represent them. They then are forced into the parental home until maybe 31 years, working for years with contracts for six months in the mirage of a permanent job. And then they said: We call for money to the old, the place they have it fixed. Big babies. But now
Brunetta can not suddenly think that this category turned against the hand that paid him the line of 'Media Management and International Relations in the European Globalisation' just because it has the promise of greater security union. There are other variables that matter, not just the monetary union security or Market Goods. Variables in the head never entered the Brunetta and never entraranno, because he does not take into account.
Indeed, it is sure what he does. On one side is certain of his theories now bookish, and the other is too incapable to succeed as a politician smell the reality as it is. Those who in the PDL policy can do is already Unmark. Why no 'big baby' never endorse such a thing, and no 'parent' would vote for him again.
