or call the anonymous Legnaghese first to appear, I believe that among civilized people is the minimum education, then ask him to enter into the matter: Reason, s compare, but not from preconceived positions from the data we have available, the allegations or on personal attacks I do not answer because "there is nothing", to say the Naples area.
I think it is appropriate to pause for the moment only on some elements, then the debate will continue whether they will face others. First, the central
when it works continuously emits radiation, even if it is not known to most people. These small doses of radiation workers are exposed and the people who live nearby.
health damage from radiation is a "no damage threshold", ie, no need to absorb large amounts of radiation illness (such as the cigarette smoke): even small doses of radiation trigger the processes of cancer, leukemia or birth defects in infants, so that the definition of "maximum permissible dose" for workers and for the public provided by the International Commission for Radiation Protection, instead of being "that particular dose below which there is no risk," and curious "that dose which are associated with somatic effects, cancer and leukemia, which are considered acceptable in the face of the economic benefits associated with such activities or radiation. " In so far as to
Rettondini, as stations are in neighboring countries, to know that: the law of the square of the distance the intensity of the radiation beam at points at different distances from the source is inversely proportional to the square of these distances. II, which means that doubling the distance from the source of the radiation intensity of the radiation beam is reduced by one quarter. Then change much between them in the home or 200km.
Finally, there remains the central dead body in radiological activities at the end with all its waste. Donatella
Ramorino
0 comments:
Post a Comment